Planting trees is not a solution
Planting trees will not make a major contribution to tackling the climate emergency.
Although there are many good reasons for planting trees, there are several problems that severely restrict the contribution that tree planting can make to tackling the climate emergency.
There are three main problems:
Although there are many good reasons for planting trees, there are several problems that severely restrict the contribution that tree planting can make to tackling the climate emergency.
There are three main problems:
- the amount of CO2 taken up by trees is too small
- the time taken is too long
- the CO2 taken up by trees is released again when the trees die and decompose.
The amount of CO2 taken up by trees is too small
The area of forest that would absorb the UK's CO2 emissions is shown at the same scale as a map of the UK
For the UK, to cancel out the CO2 emissions it produces each year (700 million tonnes CO2 [2]), it would therefore need 1.4 million square kilometres of forest. This is six times as large as the total area of the UK (which is 245,000 square kilometres), as illustrated in the diagram. This is clearly not feasible.
Furthermore, this calculation ignores the energy used in growing the sapplings, and in their distribution and planting. If we were to include these, the area needed would be even greater.
Currently, about 13% (32,000 square kilometres) of the UK land area is forrested [3]. If this were to be doubled, the CO2 taken up would be 16 million tonnes per year. This is just 2% of the UK's greenhouse gas emissions.
So planting trees cannot make a significant contribution to dealing with the UK's CO2 emissions.
Globally the situation is little better. To absorb the annual 34 Gigatonnes of CO2 would need around 68 million square kilometres of forest. This is about half the planet's land area. Given that almost all of this land is already forested, or is unsuitable for forests, or is in use for growing food, it is not possible for new forest planting to absorb the global CO2 emissions, and suggestions that it is are either wishful thinking or deceitful.
The take-up of CO2 is too slow
To stay within 1.5°C of global warming, net emissions need to be halved by 2030 (faster in high emission countries, e.g. by 2025 in the UK - see document 33). In this timescale, trees planted will still be saplings and not yet absorbing much CO2.The CO2 taken up by trees is taken up only temporarily
The CO2 taken up is usually given up again when the trees die and decay. It is only in very exceptional circumstances that fallen trees (or other vegetation) decompose only partially, resulting in peat and coal formation.Conclusions
Tree planting is not an answer to the climate crisis. Instead, we need to move quickly to solutions that will work - including phasing out fossil fuel use by stopping flying, by phasing out cars, by insulating homes, and by local food production and distribution.Misinformation on tree planting
It is clear from these simple calculation that planting trees is not an answer to the climate crisis. So it is very disappointing that this method is so often put forward.Exagerrated claims are often made, but don't stand up to scrutiny and have to be withdrawn, e.g. see claims by Zurich scientists ( document 95.
It is important that policies are based on the science.
Other estimates for CO2 taken up by trees
The source used for the calculations in this article is the paper from the United States Department of Agriculture [1] giving 0.5 kg CO2 per square metre per year.A second source gives a roughly similar figure. According to the Trees in Trust website [4], an acre of mature trees can capture 2.6 tonnes of CO2 per year (the original source is not given). An acre is 4047 square metres, and so this is equivalent to 0.64 kg CO2 per square metre per year.
Other assessments of tree planting
- A study reported in the Independent [5] also found that tree planting is not a feasible way of removing CO2 from the atmosphere because there simply is not enough land.
- A web page [6] from the Grantham Institute at Imperial College gives a similar opinion.
- A group of scientists at Zurich University initially claimed that global tree restoration is "our most effective climate change solution" (Jul 2019), but later withdrew their claim (Oct 2019) - see document 95.
References
[1] | Carbon Storage and Accumulation in United States Forest Ecosystems United States Department of Agriculture (1992) https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_wo059.pdf. The amount of carbon taken up is given as 0.14 kg per square metre per year. To convert from weight of carbon to weight of CO2, we multiply by 3.67, to give 0.5 kg per square metre per year. |
[2] | https://www.carbonindependent.org/23.html |
[3] | https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/tools-and-resources/statistics/statistics-by-topic/woodland-statistics/ viewed 27.12.19. |
[4] | http://www.treesintrust.com/environmental.shtm viewed 21.5.19. |
[5] | The Independent (2017) There's so much CO2 in the atmosphere that planting trees can no longer save us https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/co2-atmosphere-planting-trees-oxygen-greenhouse-gas-carbon-dioxide-earth-scientists-climate-change-a8116856.html viewed 21.5.19. |
[6] | https://granthaminstitute.com/2015/09/02/how-much-co2-can-trees-take-up/ viewed 21.5.19. |
First published: May 2019
Last updated: 26 Sep 2023